Audio from the Sabbath School class of 27 April 2014 is available here.

In this class we finish discussing Matthew Vines’ revisionist interpretation of Romans 1.26-27, and we begin our consideration of the two remaining passages in this discussion, 1 Corinthians 6.9 and 1 Timothy 1.10. Here we find that Matthew Vines attempts to isolate the key terms from their context and etymology (atomisation) and then he suggests that we cannot come to any definite understanding of their meaning (lexical agnosticism).

The Lord’s Day sermons for 27 April 2014 are available below and on the Sermons page.

• 27 April 2014: Rev. Gary N. Roop
  • AM Sermon: 1 Timothy 5.1-2
  • PM Sermon: 1 Kings 19.19-21

The bulletin for this Lord’s Day is available here as a PDF.

Audio from the Sabbath School class of 20 April 2014 is available here.

In this class we take time to consider the recent history of books published with the aim of advancing a revisionist perspective on the Scriptures and homosexuality. Matthew Vines’ book is being published this week by an erstwhile evangelical-style publishing house. There has been a marked increase in the number of such books published over the past few years. We consider how this may affect modern evangelicalism in our land.

The Lord’s Day sermons for 20 April 2014 are available below and on the Sermons page.

• 20 April 2014: Rev. Gary N. Roop
  • AM Sermon: 1 Timothy 4.13-16
  • PM Sermon: 1 Kings 19.11-18

The bulletin for this Lord’s Day is available here as a PDF.

Audio from the Sabbath School class of 13 April 2014 is available here.

In this class we turn our study to Matthew Vines’ revisionist treatment of Romans 1.26-27.

The Lord’s Day sermons for 13 April 2014 are available below and on the Sermons page.

• 13 April 2014: Rev. Gary N. Roop
  • AM Sermon: 1 Timothy 4.12-16
  • PM Sermon: 1 Kings 19.1-18

The bulletin for this Lord’s Day is available here as a PDF.

Audio from the Sabbath School class of 6 April 2014 is available here.

In this class we continue our study of Matthew Vines’ revisionist treatment of Leviticus 18.22, and Leviticus 20.13.